|
BioTools Inc
prota-3s Prota 3s, supplied by BioTools Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/prota-3s/product/BioTools Inc Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
prota-3s - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
92/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
protac based ar inhibitor mtx 23 Protac Based Ar Inhibitor Mtx 23, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protac based ar inhibitor mtx 23/product/MedChemExpress Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protac based ar inhibitor mtx 23 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bristol Myers
protac-based bcl6 inhibitors bms-986458 ![]() Protac Based Bcl6 Inhibitors Bms 986458, supplied by Bristol Myers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protac-based bcl6 inhibitors bms-986458/product/Bristol Myers Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protac-based bcl6 inhibitors bms-986458 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Takeda
dasatinib-based protacs ![]() Dasatinib Based Protacs, supplied by Takeda, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/dasatinib-based protacs/product/Takeda Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dasatinib-based protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedChemExpress
protac sgk3 degrader-1 ![]() Protac Sgk3 Degrader 1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protac sgk3 degrader-1/product/MedChemExpress Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protac sgk3 degrader-1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Amgen
vhl-based protacs ![]() Vhl Based Protacs, supplied by Amgen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/vhl-based protacs/product/Amgen Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vhl-based protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Mimetics
bh3-mimetics ![]() Bh3 Mimetics, supplied by Mimetics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/bh3-mimetics/product/Mimetics Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
bh3-mimetics - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bayer AG
protacs ![]() Protacs, supplied by Bayer AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protacs/product/Bayer AG Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Arvinas Inc
protacs ![]() Protacs, supplied by Arvinas Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protacs/product/Arvinas Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Bemis Inc
protacs ![]() Protacs, supplied by Bemis Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protacs/product/Bemis Inc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Merck KGaA
asds of protacs ![]() Asds Of Protacs, supplied by Merck KGaA, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/asds of protacs/product/Merck KGaA Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
asds of protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Haisco Pharmaceutical
protacs ![]() Protacs, supplied by Haisco Pharmaceutical, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/result/protacs/product/Haisco Pharmaceutical Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
protacs - by Bioz Stars,
2026-04
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Article Title: B Cell Lymphoma 6 (BCL6): A Conserved Regulator of Immunity and Beyond
doi: 10.3390/ijms252010968
Figure Lengend Snippet: Structure and function of the BCL6 protein. ( A ). Domains of the BCL6 protein: BTB (light blue), RD2/PEST (blue), and ZF (dark blue, with striping for fingers not involved in DNA binding). Above is a schematic representation of the structure of each domain along with their interacting proteins, including co-repressors (pink) and associated transcriptional regulators (orange) and DNA modifying proteins (green), with sites of ubiquitination (Ub), phosphorylation (P), and acetylation (Ac) indicated (brown). ( B ). Major molecular function(s) of each domain. ( C ). Biological roles mapped to the molecular functions, with proven connections shown as filled boxes and assumed ones as unfilled boxes. Abbreviations: BTB: broad complex/tram track/bric-a-brac; RD2: repression domain 2; PEST: proline–glutamic acid–serine–threonine; ZF: zinc finger.
Article Snippet: Clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate
Techniques: Binding Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Phospho-proteomics
Journal: Biochemical Society Transactions
Article Title: Discovery, development and application of drugs targeting BCL-2 pro-survival proteins in cancer
doi: 10.1042/BST20210749
Figure Lengend Snippet: Key BH3-mimetics leading to the clinical applications or as tool compounds
Article Snippet: Nevertheless, exciting new approaches such as
Techniques: Modification, Clinical Proteomics, In Vivo, Activity Assay, Solubility, High Throughput Screening Assay
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: PROTAC datasets and their characterization. (A) Overview of the structural composition of the PROTACs in the VHL ( n = 115) and CRBN ( n = 113) sets. (B) Distribution of the molecular descriptors of Lipinski’s and Veber’s guidelines for the two sets. Box plots show the 50 th percentiles as horizontal bars, the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as boxes, and the 25 th percentile minus 1.5 × the interquartile range and the 75 th percentile plus 1.5 × the interquartile range as whiskers. Outliers are shown both as red dots and as circles in the color of the appropriate descriptor. (C) Score plots of the first two principal components from principal component analyses (PCAs), which describe 71.5% of the variance for the VHL set and 74.9% of the variance for CRBN. The PCAs were based on the 17 descriptors calculated for each PROTAC, which were subsequently used for construction of the permeability models (cf. Figure A). Ellipses in green, yellow, and red shading show the 95% confidence intervals for highly, moderately, and lowly permeable compounds, respectively. The centroid of each permeability class is indicated with a large circle in the color of the respective class. The contributions of individual descriptors to the PCAs are indicated by arrows.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Principal component analysis comparing the chemical space of PROTACs in the public domain (red and cyan circles) to our in-house set (green circles). Public PROTACs that are within the applicability domain of the in-house set are in red, while those outside are in cyan. The centroids for each set are indicated with a large circle in the color of the respective set. (B) Examples of molecular structures of two PROTACs that reside outside the chemical space of the in-house set. The descriptors of the Lipinski and Veber guidelines are given below the structure of each PROTAC.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques:
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Cohen’s kappa statistics for internal test set validation of different BCMs for three permeability scenarios of (A) CRBN and (B) VHL PROTACs. Box plots show the kappa values from 25 random seedlings, while the yellow circles show the kappa values from 10-fold cross validation. In the box plots, the 50 th percentiles are marked as horizontal bars, the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as boxes, and the 25 th percentile minus 1.5 × the interquartile range and the 75 th percentile plus 1.5 × the interquartile range as whiskers. Outliers are shown both as black dots and as circles in the color of the method used to build the model. DT: decision tree, kNN: kappa nearest neighbor, RF: random forest, and SVM: support vector machine. Classification models can be assessed using the following cut-offs for Cohen’s kappa: κ < 0: no agreement, 0–0.19: poor agreement, 0.20–0.39: fair agreement, 0.40–0.59: moderate agreement, and 0.60–0.79 and 0.80–1.00: substantial to perfect agreement.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Permeability, Plasmid Preparation
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Probability distribution of true predictions for the random forest models built using the original VHL dataset. PROTACs having a probability smaller or larger than 0.5 were correctly classified as having low (orange) or high (green) permeability, respectively. A probability of 0.9–1.0 indicates that the compound was predicted to have a high permeability with >90% probability. Similarly, a probability of 0–0.1 indicates that the compound was predicted to have a low permeability with >90% probability.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Number of compounds in the training sets of PROTACs used to construct BCMs (original and retrained set) and the datasets used as blinded test sets for validation of the models (blinded test sets 1 and 2). For each dataset, the distribution of compounds between VHL and CRBN PROTACs, as well as by permeability class, is given.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Construct, Biomarker Discovery, Permeability
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Cohen’s kappa coefficient for prediction of the permeability of the VHL and CRBN PROTACs in the blinded test set 1. The kappa coefficient is given for the three permeability scenarios for models constructed using the DT, kNN, and RF methods based on the original dataset and its SMOTE versions. Kappa coefficients have been color-coded using red-orange-yellow-green for values ranging from −0.3 to 0.7.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability, Construct
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Cohen’s kappa statistics for internal validation of different retrained BCMs for three permeability scenarios of (A) CRBN and (B) VHL PROTACs in the retrained set. Box plots show the kappa values from 25 random seedlings, while the yellow circles show the kappa values from 10-fold cross validation. In the box plots, the 50 th percentiles are marked as horizontal bars, the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as boxes, and the 25 th percentile minus 1.5 × the interquartile range and the 75 th percentile plus 1.5 × the interquartile range as whiskers. Outliers are shown both as black dots and as circles in the color of the method used to build the model. DT: decision tree, kNN: kappa nearest neighbor, and RF: random forest. Classification models can be assessed using the following cut-offs for Cohen’s kappa: k < 0: no agreement, 0–0.19: poor agreement, 0.20–0.39: fair agreement, 0.40–0.59: moderate agreement, and 0.60–0.79 and 0.80–1.00: substantial to perfect agreement.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Permeability
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Cohen’s kappa coefficient for prediction of the permeability of the VHL PROTACs in the blinded test set 2 using models constructed with the (A) original training set and the (B) retraining set. The kappa coefficient is given for the three permeability scenarios for models constructed using the DT, kNN, and RF methods. Kappa coefficients have been color-coded using red-orange-yellow-green for values ranging from −0.30 to 0.70.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability, Construct
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Contribution of the descriptors to the retrained RF models for prediction of the permeability of VHL PROTACs. The figure shows the mean values of the weight of each descriptor for permeability scenarios 1–3, with error bars indicating ± standard deviation. The weight of the contribution of each descriptor to the model was obtained from the 10-fold cross validation. The descriptors that contribute most to the model are indicated by the blue shading at a weight of ≥0.4. Color code: violet: countable descriptors, pink: chemical functionalities descriptors, and green: size and shape descriptors. Descriptor contributions for the individual models for scenarios 1–3 can be found in the Supporting Information, Figure S10B .
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability, Standard Deviation, Biomarker Discovery
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Distribution of the molecular descriptors of Lipinski’s and Veber’s guidelines for the linker part ( n = 129) of the VHL PROTACs in the combined training set and blinded test set 1 ( n = 253). Distributions have been calculated for the linkers of the PROTACS in each of the three permeability classes. Box plots show the 50 th percentiles as horizontal bars, the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as boxes, and the 25 th percentile minus 1.5 × the interquartile range and the 75 th percentile plus 1.5 × the interquartile range as whiskers. Outliers are shown both as black dots. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon’s non-parametric test.
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Permeability
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Number of PROTACs Used for Data Analysis, Model Building, and Validation
Article Snippet: All
Techniques:
Journal: ACS Omega
Article Title: Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
Figure Lengend Snippet: Overview of Purities of the PROTACs Included in the Training and Tests Sets
Article Snippet: All
Techniques: Standard Deviation
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Structures of the designed PROTACs 1 – 9 and their linkers.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques:
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Correlation between the cell permeabilities, i.e., the ratio between the potencies for binding to VHL in a cell-based and in a biochemical assay, and the membrane permeabilities in the PAMPA assay of PROTACs 1 – 9 . The faint red, orange, yellow and green shading indicates the cut-offs for low, medium–low, medium–high and high cell permeability classes, respectively, as determined by the in cellulo/in vitro permeability ratios. The filled circle for each compound has been color coded in the same way. Note that the PAMPA permeabilities of PROTACs 4 and 5 (marked in light orange) are lower than, or equal to the plotted values.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: Binding Assay, Membrane, PAMPA Assay, Permeability, In Vitro
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Overview of the experimentally determined nuclear Overhauser effects, that were used in the NAMFIS analysis of PROTACs 1 – 3 , 6 , 7 , and 9 , determined (A) at low temperature (−20 or −25 °C) and (B) at room temperature (+25 °C). The temperature used to record the NMR spectra and the permeability class (cf. Table ) is given for each PROTAC. Blue lines indicate long-range NOEs between protons in the ERK5 and VHL ligands, or between protons in one of the ligands and protons at the other end of the linker. All other NOEs are indicated by red lines. The conformational ensemble of 9 has been reported previously.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: Permeability
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Solvent accessible 3D polar surface area (SA 3D PSA) and (B) radius of gyration ( R gyr ) for the solution ensembles in CDCl 3 of PROTACs , 6 , and 7 at −20 or −25 °C, and of PROTACs 3 and 9 at +25 °C. The permeability class (cf. Table ) is given below the number of each PROTAC. The area of each circle is proportional to the population (in %) of the corresponding conformation. The number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds (IMHB) in each conformation is indicated by the color coding. Population weighted mean values are shown as red plus signs.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: Solvent, Permeability
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparisons of the conformations in the ensembles of PROTACs 2 , 6 , 7 , 3 , and 9 that have the highest and lowest surface accessible 3D polar surface area (SA 3D PSA). For each conformation the SA 3D PSA of the ERK5 and VHL ligands, and of the linker, is given adjacent to the corresponding bracket. Intramolecular hydrogen bonds (IMHBs) are indicated by blue dotted lines, and π–π interactions by black lines having a dot at each end. Conformations that have low populations (2 or 3%) have been omitted from the comparisons. The permeability class of each PROTAC is given in brackets after its number.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: Permeability
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Intramolecular interactions in the conformations of PROTACs 2 and 7 that have the lowest surface accessible 3D polar surface area (SA 3D PSA). Intramolecular hydrogen bonds (IMHBs) are indicated by blue dotted lines, π–π interactions by black lines having a dot at each end, and the NH-π interaction in the conformation of 7 by green arrows. (B) Surface representation of the two low SA 3D PSA conformations in the same orientation as in panel A. Surface exposed oxygen atoms are red, nitrogen atoms and nitrogen atoms carrying hydrogen atoms are blue, while the surface exposed sulfur atom in each PROTAC is yellow.
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques:
a " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of Descriptors for the Outer Limits of PROTAC and bRo5 Oral Druggable Space with Those Calculated for PROTACs 1 – 9
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: Comparison
a " width="100%" height="100%">
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Lipophilicity and Cell Permeabilities for PROTACs 1 – 9
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques: In Vitro, Permeability, PAMPA Assay
Journal: Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article Title: Impact of Linker Composition on VHL PROTAC Cell Permeability
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c02492
Figure Lengend Snippet: Population of the Conformations in the Solution Ensembles of PROTACs 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , and 9
Article Snippet: In addition, structure–property relationship studies of 1806
Techniques:
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Article Title: Kinase Inhibitors and Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapies: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives
doi: 10.3390/ijms25105489
Figure Lengend Snippet: Mechanism of action of kinase-targeted cancer therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and nanobodies, kinase degraders, and protein–kinase interaction inhibitors. ( a ) Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) primarily inhibit signal transduction through the binding of the antibody’s Fab segment to the receptor’s extracellular domain. Nanobodies lack the Fc portion, also known as single-domain antibodies or VHH. ( b ) PROTACs are bifunctional molecules that induce the proximity of E3 ligases and the protein of interest (POI) by linking them via ligands. Molecular glue is a monovalent molecule that binds to the surface of E3 ligase receptors, achieving binding to the target protein through protein–protein interactions and leading to the degradation of the POI. ( c ) Protein–kinase interaction inhibitors (PKIIs), including small molecules and linear peptides, inhibit the interaction between kinases and substrates, being ideal candidates for inhibiting protein–protein interactions (PPIs).
Article Snippet: EGFR , HSK40118 ,
Techniques: Bioprocessing, Transduction, Binding Assay, Protein-Protein interactions
Journal: International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Article Title: Kinase Inhibitors and Kinase-Targeted Cancer Therapies: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives
doi: 10.3390/ijms25105489
Figure Lengend Snippet: New strategies for targeting kinases.
Article Snippet: EGFR , HSK40118 ,
Techniques: Mutagenesis